![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Future Aircraft Carrier (CVF) Queen Elizabeth Class Part 25
Catapults One of the central engineering and design problems posed to the rival CVF design teams in AP1 & early 2 was how best to power and integrate the aircraft catapults in a CTOL CVF configuration. The selection by the MOD of an adoptable CVF design which will initially only operate STOVL aircraft has allowed for a postponement of this catapult dilemma, which was a significant challenge for both consortia in their CTOL CVF designs. While electro-magnetic catapult (EMCAT) systems are slowly maturing (see below), if a decision had had to be made in a 2002-3 time scale then a traditional steam design would have been reluctantly selected for any CTOL CVF design. General Atomics and Northrop Grumman are both currently developing electro-magnetic prototypes which are destined to support the US Navy's CVN-21 programme (which will be a contemporary of CVF) but the Royal Navy was reluctant to commit itself to an unproven technology. Officials from both competing CVF teams made it clear during 2002 that given the development risks still associated with EMCAT technology, steam catapults in the form of the C13 system employed in all current US Navy carriers represented the only proven, reliable, low-risk solution for CVF at Main Gate. "Steam exists, and the C13-2 catapult is the launch system against which the JSF CV variant is being built," said a senior member of the BAE Systems ship/air interface team. "Its performance characteristics are going to be matched around that technology". A Thales source concurred. "Today's steam-catapult technology is very, very reliable. There are still a lot of unknowns concerning EMCAT technology, such as pulse effects on other ship systems."
However there was also a strong disinclination towards steam within the RN given its through-life cost implications, while requirements for high volumes of steam and water present problems for a non-nuclear carrier like CVF, indeed the large amounts of water and steam required may have an adverse effect upon the carrier's electrical systems. Another problem facing designers was that a traditional steam catapult is not compatible with the IFEP system planned for the CVF, a separate and expensive auxiliary steam plant with considerable output would therefore be required. There remains a small possibility that the CVF's will be
completed with one or two catapults, e.g. for the operation of Hawkeye
AEW aircraft
or because of serious problems with the STOVL variant of the F-35 Joint
Strike.
It would seem that the CVF
Platform Design Team has had considerable problems retaining this
capacity despite the reduction in ship size since May 2003, and this has
not been
EMCAT/EMALS/EMKIT
If the CVF carriers are ever
converted to a
The "Future Carrier Alliance" propose that the CVF will be built to accommodate a potential electromagnetic catapult (EMCAT) backfit. This will incur some additional costs at build, but will help 'future proof' the carrier design to accommodate new aircraft and air vehicles through its life - as is required by the MOD. Compared with traditional steam catapults, EMCATs offer the prospect of significant life-cycle cost benefits (in terms of reduced maintenance and crew workload) and would also offer benefits for aircraft operations and flight-deck operability. EMCAT's should increase launch performance and make significant reductions in installed weight, volume, and manning workload requirements. Early studies by DERA in the late 1990's indicated that a 90MW 300ft long linear motor EMCAT able to accelerate every 45 seconds a 100,000 lb. airplane to over 130 knots, or a lighter aircraft (such as UAV's) to 200 knots, would seem to be viable. The DPA announced in June 2000 a planning and test programme to examine whether EMCAT technology was a viable catapult option for CVF. The solicitation for the technology demonstration stated: "The electromagnetic technology is considered to be available, but has never been built to the anticipated scale or integrated into a warship system. [The] MoD wishes to develop and de-risk the technology in support of the FCBA programme, through the design, construction, integration and test of a system at a suitably representative scale. ... The two-phase programme whilst reducing the technological risk aspects of the system, shall also provide unit production cost, through life cost and [availability, reliability and maintainability] information to allow objective comparisons to be made with alternative steam catapults." The programme was
never backed by BAE Systems and Thales
Separately, across the Atlantic, the USN is actively planning for an
Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) to enter service aboard
the projected CVN-21 class from 2014 - a comparable timeframe to
CVF. EMALS promises to
deliver better performance and launch control that is tailored for a
broader range of aircraft. It will accelerate aircraft weighing roughly
4500 to 45,000 kg to launch speeds of 100 to 370 km/h, with a controlled
deftness that the inflexible, brute-force steam cats can't manage.
Adjusting to the weight of the craft will mean less stress on the
airframe. This will be especially crucial as the military adopts
unmanned aircraft (UAV's) for surveillance as well as combat. The heart of the USN EMALS is the 103-meter-long linear induction
motor, which propels an armature, with the aircraft attached. The
linear motor of the EMALS is powered by energy from rotational storage
devices that draw electric power from the ship's electrical distribution
system. Initial EMALS design concepts included flywheels and pulse disk
alternators, later eschewed in favor of more traditional systems that
store energy in the rotors of generators, according to Richard Bushway,
the U.S. Navy's EMALS program director. Kinetic energy from the
rotating system is converted into electric energy, and a solid-state
power-conditioning system delivers a tremendous 2- to 3-second pulse of
power to the stator. The system must deliver the pulse as often as
every 45 seconds to match the capability of the current steam catapult.
The EMALS system will use a 103 metre long linear electric motor
to accelerate aircraft over the flight deck, employing rotational energy
storage alternators to supply high-frequency power to the linear motor
through a PWM inverter. The linear motor takes the average power from
the inverter and releases it in a short pulse, which accelerates the
aircraft for launch. A closed-loop system, it constantly monitors itself, continuously
adjusting the speed and power to create a launch profile tailored to
each type of aircraft. Steam catapults are open-loop systems, with no
sensors or feedback once the launch sequence is initiated. In
addition to allowing greater control flexibility, EMALS should
eventually be half the size and weight of steam cat systems. Eliminating
the maze of high-pressure, high-temperature steam pipes and valves will
also lessen the risk to the crew during routine operations and battle.
It's also expected that with its electric and electronics subystems,
EMALS could be serviced and maintained by an estimated 30 percent fewer
crew members. Further, the EMALS is modular, so that components and
subsystems can be swapped in and out both for maintenance and if,
Under parallel programme-definition and risk-reduction
contracts awarded in December 1999, teams led by General Atomics and
Northrop Grumman have each built full-scale, reduced length (c.50m) prototype systems,
which were delivered to
delivered in
September 2003 to the U.S. Naval Air Systems Command site in Lakehurst,
N.J. for testing and evaluation. Following the hardware
demonstrations, in April 2004 General Atomics was downselected and awarded a
$145 million System Development and Demonstration (SDD)
contract included the design, fabrication, delivery,
integration, test and support of one full scale, full length, shipboard
representative Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) for NAVAIR
Lakehurst, at the Naval Air Engineering Station Lakehurst, N.J. It's expected that the first USN carrier to be fitted with EMALS catapults will be CVN-78, the
lead ship of the new CVN-21 class, and expected to enter service in 2015. She will fitted with four EMALS systems, each costing about US $26.5 million. The USN has held talks with the MoD over possible UK participation in
the EMALS programme. Apparently in 2004 the CVF platform design team asked General Atomics for technical
information on their EMALS catapult so that appropriate provision could
be made in the CVF design, but GA refused - in compliance with US laws.
The USN's EMALS programme and
associated information is classified and the UK government had to negotiate with the US government to establish
arrangements relating to the disclosure, transfer, and use of technical
information. In late 2005 UK MOD sources disclosed that there had indeed been a
recent joint study with the US Navy to examine the feasibility of
fitting EMALS to CVF. Given programme and risk issues, and projected equipment availability,
EMALS catapults would not be available for delivery to the UK prior
to 2015.
Meanwhile, in April 2006 Converteam (as Alstom had been
renamed) was awarded a further MoD Research Acquisition Organisation for
the design, build and testing of an Electro-Magnetic Kinetic Integrated
Technology (EMKIT) unmanned Air Vehicle (UAV) technology
demonstrator to demonstrate electromagnetic launch technology through the
testing of a high-speed high acceleration demonstrator using advanced
linear motor technology. The system commissioned in December 2006
with land-based trials to commence in early 2007. The
demonstrator builds on the previous EMCAT project. With two 3.2 MJ energy stores and a 14 metres launch length, it
can launch UAV's of up to 500kg at a speed up to 50 m/sec. The notional
operation requirement is for a production EMKIT system that will be
able to launch UAV's such as the Hermes 180, Hermes 450, Eagle 1 and
Predator A from ships as small as a frigate. Arresting Gear Like the catapults, it seems likely that any CTOL conversion
of CVF will be fitted with US made arresting
gear engines. The current USN standard is the Mark 7 Mod 3, however starting with the USS
Ronald Reagan the USN is
moving to a new three-wire Mark 7 Mod 4 arresting gear design (actually
four arresting gear engines but with two of them interchangeable as
the barricade engine). The new system uses polycore cables
designed to withstand more traps than steel cables and extra-large
pulleys to reduce maintenance and man-hours, and provides the capability
to land potentially larger and heavier aircraft. It is hoped that
the new design will reduce maintenance requirements by half by
increasing the time interval between inspections and overhauls, in
addition, the costs associated with replacing these high-wear components
will be reduced. Another benefit of this system will be that the
arresting gear engines will be more accessible to flight line crews. Back to top
|< <
Part 25 >
>| |
|
© 2004-8 Richard Beedall unless otherwise indicated. |